Post by bongobill on Feb 11, 2014 18:07:48 GMT
Disclaimer, I have history with "trying" to deal with Buchanan, I dislike them with a passion, so take anything I say with regards to them with this in mind!
Do we/will we have an issue?
Now, this has not been a concern for a long while, until they entered the Range arena, I still had/have low expectations despite some early quick replies (to Rexco I believe).
I'm not sure who (sorry 
) but somebody enquired about the holding % for RRL in CTR and had a reply along the lines of " we won't comment on Historical/past actions" or words roughly to that effect!
Now this is a similar sort of avoidance BS that I've had in the past, so more in keeping with what I expect 
Is it for them to decide what they will and won't answer? Surely it's the company that decides? They are there for IR, so that, amongst other things we as Pi's can ask questions of our BOD/Company through the correct channels.
One of the problems previously was that if it wasn't a bog standard (fob off IMO) answer then they were....... mmmm, at best reluctant to try for an answer, indeed many a time Mr phibbs, lol (Phipps, (boy can I pick em 
)) maintained that he'd not answered as he'd not been asked, could be telling porkies I suppose, however, no matter what you think of him, if you called or spoke to him he was very "PL" and always answered questions (where possible) in my experience.
I can understand that we would all like a "line drawn in the sand" but sadly this is not practical on certain levels IMO, too many things for our companies future are obviously linked to it's past.
So after all that bluster, in answer to my own question, I DO 
I hope to be proven wrong, I won't be holding my breath Let's hope that they ask and answer RIG's latest question!
ATB Bill
